Katherine johnson nasa scientist update#

It's something that a particular set of racists do whenever they are faced with a brilliant person of a different race. What is more ironically amusing is that people who use irrelevant statistics to determine something as personal as individual traits such as intelligence are ironically showing a bit of stupidity themselves. We can and we should find the historical wrong and right it. If restoring that traitor's citizenship status after a century is deemed to be important, giving credit to women scientists for their contribution to NASA is important too. Gen Lee's application for citizenship with formal sworn renunciation of his allegiance to Confederacy was taken home as a personal souvenir by the Secretary of State and was found in attic after several decades. We restored Robert E Lee's citizenship decades after he died. We award Congressional Medal of Honor posthumously after several decades. I am sure it would be possible to find the long forgotten women contributors and right the wrong. That is the level of documentation they maintain.

Katherine johnson nasa scientist update#

NASA studied the suggestion for two years and rejected it because the documentation update would be prohibitive. He suggesting marking the 3 o'clock and 9 o'clock bolts in addition to help them better. He noticed they were marking the bolts at 12 o'clock and 6 o'clock positions to help align solid booster rocket section assembly. Richard Feynman suggested something trivial. How did they even justify such an unscientific discriminatory policy? Were there any male scientists who objected to it? Did any female scientist raise objections? Is it possible to dig through old NASA records to find such contributions?īTW it should be possible to find it in the archives. NASA officially had a policy not to list female contributors to papers as co-authors? Wow! That was simply awful. this is someone actively contributing to the outcomes, but who got ignored when it came time for credit.

This isn't some flunky doing the boring calculations beneath the principal researchers. Katherine was assertive, asking to be included in editorial meetings (where no women had gone before.) She simply told people she had done the work and that she belonged.' Katherine's knowledge of analytic geometry helped make quick allies of male bosses and colleagues to the extent that,'they forgot to return me to the pool.' While the racial and gender barriers were always there, Katherine says she ignored them. Then one day, Katherine (and a colleague) were temporarily assigned to help the all-male flight research team. ' Their main job was to read the data from the black boxes of planes and carry out other precise mathematical tasks. Katherine has referred to the women in the pool as virtual ` who wore. At first she worked in a pool of women performing math calculations. '.in June 1953, Katherine was contracted as a research mathematician at the Langley Research Center. I’m hoping that highlighting women and other marginalized groups and their contributions to science and society as a whole will gradually enlighten the human race. It becomes *criminal* when you actively interfere with someone’s life on the basis of a prejudgement like this.

Bigotry in general is about deciding that someone is incompetent or inferior on the basis of superficial traits. IQ is sometimes used as an *excuse* for racism, but if that were not a factor, racists would find another excuse. (Of course, none of this accounts for aspects of intelligence not considered by IQ, like social ability.) This guarantees that geniuses would be found in large populations. However, in every case, the standard deviation was very high. They found the average Asian IQ to be higher tna the average Caucasian IQ, which was higher than the average African IQ. I was reading a journal paper from the 1970’s or something that presented average IQs for different genetic groups. Geniuses in general are rare, so if you’re looking for them, the last thing you want to do is summarily exclude any segment of any population, simply because YOU believe some of their characteristics correlate less with genius. If only we as a society can now stop thinking of these people as abberations just on the basis of gender and other genetic factors.